Share review – Brighton Energy Coop

Brighton Energy Co-operative offers the opportunity to invest in the construction of community solar projects through nontransferable shares with an investment return of 5%. This was one of my easiest investment choices since it ticked all my boxes. It was:

Local (i lived in Brighton at the time)

Renewable energy

Constructing solar arrays

Community pr

A good rate of return

I’m quite happy with this investment, things were a bit Brighton-style chaotic at the beginning but nowadays there is a company managing the investments and it is chugging along just great.

Website

Share Review – Good Energy

When i head that it was possible to invest in Good Energy i jumped at the chance. I was using them as my utility supplier for gas and electricity since their early days and I was happy to support them in their quest to be 100% green.

Buying the shares was a bit odd, they are listed on a special exchange and I needed to use a broker to buy

ISA Review: Triodos Sustainable Equity Fund

Disclaimer – it’s just my opinion maaaaan

Triodos Sustainable Equity Fund

First off, I’ve got to say I LOVE Triodos. I don’t have this product but i have others from Triodos and I think they are great.

Why do I like them? Well two main reasons.

  1. They are actually ethical.
  2. They provide a viable alternative to mainstream banks. Since 2017 they even offer a current account.

Screening

OK but as we know ethical can mean many things and the word is often stretched to breaking point by unscrupulous agents. So let’s take a look at Triodos’s ethical criteria for the fund. It comes in 3 steps!

1 Positive Screening

  • Sustainable food and agriculture
  • Sustainable mobility and infrastructure
  • Renewable resources
  • Innovation for sustainability
  • Circular economy
  • Prosperous and healthy people
  • Social inclusion and empowerment


2 Negative screening

The negative screening is immediately available as a pdf, no hunting around is required. The screening covers the same ground as normal but in more detail and great scope. Let’s take tobacco for example:

Tobacco products include finished products such as cigarettes and cigars, but also key materials necessary for the production thereof, such as cigarette paper and filters. Triodos Bank believes that people are free to pursue their activities of choice insofar as these are legal and do not negatively affect others or the environment. Triodos Bank chooses to limit its involvement with tobacco products as they contribute to serious health problems and negatively impact others, e.g. in the form of passive smoking.

Triodos Bank excludes companies that:
Produce tobacco products or sell such products under their own label.

I think that is very well written (since it chimes well with my own views perhaps!)

3 Ongoing monitoring

We conduct an integrated financial and sustainability analysis on each prospective company. This looks at the potential impact of economic, social and environmental changes on a company’s business model and future financial performance.

This is a bit buzzwordy yes, but i already trust Triodos. And of course they do ongoing analysis.

Funds normally have 2/3 of these tests, but this is all 3 and all 3 done well (And the positive screening is seldom done and it is the most important part.). That makes this fund much more ethical in my opinion. What i am now calling ‘hard ethical.’

Holdings

So let’s check the top5 holdings:

  • Central Japan Railways – Japan’s most profitable and highest throughput high-speed-rail operator
  • Anthem Inc – US health insurance company
  • Roche – Swiss multinational healthcare company
  • Cisco Systems – US multinational technology conglomerate
  • Bridgestone Corp – Japanese multinational auto and truck parts manufacturer

Hmm I’ve got to say I’m a bit disappointed here:

  • Trains
  • Two healthcare multinationals 😦
  • Cisco are a huge company. There are only three mentions of ‘sustainable’ (another three for ‘sustainability’, ‘ethical’ has two) in their 2017 annual report.
  • Bridgestone are the world’s largest tyre manufacturer.

That is not impressive at all. To be honest only the highspeed train company seems sustainable to me. This is disappointing. 35% of investments are in the USA. I also find that curious. From the KIID: At least 67% of the fund’s net assets are invested in shares of large cap companies and up to 33% of its net assets in shares of small and mid cap companies. I guess that explains things a bit.

VERDICT

Triodos are a big player and can be trusted, despite their disappointing top5. This is a great ethical investment, however i doubt whether it is hard ethical as with previous Triodos investments (for example Thrive Renewables). Still it is at least sustainable based on positive screening and can be expected (with no guarantee) to give a good return. I’ll be looking into this myself.

Fund review: Ventus

The Ventus Funds are two, Ventus VCT plc and Ventus 2 VCT plc

The Ventus Funds have raised and invested over £50 million in companies which have developed and constructed renewable energy projects in the UK: wind, hydro-electric and land-fill gas. Their investment portfolios are now comprised of companies all of which own projects that are operational and generating electricity and revenue.

The Ventus Funds have a clear dividend objective, aimed at delivering long term sustainable tax free yield to investors.

I’m not 100% sure what “sustainable” means in that context but I do see this as dovetailing with my hard ethical interests. And seeing as other investments in renewables have done so well, I am thinking hard about investing in these guys.

Most of the top10 holdings in Ventus 2 are wind farms, nice so it pass my requirements easily. I like the sound of Bernard Matthews Green Energy Halesworth.

Fund review: Trojan “Ethical” Income

This one is bad … when a company has a fund and then they make an “ethical” fund which does negative screening to take out the really bad guys from the other fund. Pathetic.

Top10 holdings as of 31 July 2020: Gold / VISA / Agilent / Microsoft / Gold / Alphabet / Unilever / Nestle / Colgate / Medtronic

Why the FUCK did this get a Responsible A rating from squaremileresearch !?

LOL .. nowhere near my criteria

Fund Review: Downing One VCT

The Downing One VCT is currently open for investment, so I am interested to check it out.

Trustnet

A generalist VCT giving you the opportunity to invest in over 90 companies from software & services to education. This VCT has an existing track record from income-generating, ventures and quoted companies.

Downing ONE VCT already has a diverse portfolio of 93 carefully selected companies across a range of sectors (as at 31 July 2020). Examples are software & services, healthcare services, education and alternative energy.

At Downing, we believe a great investment opportunity isn’t just financial, it’s a chance to invest in things that matter – our environment, our health, our society, our local communities and our economy. We were founded in 1986 and we’ve been working this way ever since.

Sounds ok, what are they invested in?

  1. Pilgrim Trading Ltd operates two children’s nurseries
  2. YES

  3. Parsable is empowering today’s frontline employees
  4. HMM

  5. Anpario are a world leader in producing Specialist Feed Additive Technologies
  6. HMM

So far so vague … if I was already in the Downing universe perhaps I’d be more amenable but I’d like assurances on the ethical nature of this investment. Money Week has nothing on that, just calling it “well diversified”. The Wealth Club review is a bit more illuminating:

The VCT in its current form is the product of a series of mergers. The most recent was in November 2013, when Downing Distribution VCT 1, which dates back to 1997, merged with five other VCTs (which had themselves previously merged with other VCTs) and changed its name to Downing ONE VCT.

At the point of the merger, the portfolio included investments made by Downing, as well as by previous managers of the VCTs Downing took over, including Rathbones, Framlington, and Legg Mason.

Historically, the portfolio was split between yield-focused unquoted investments (typically asset-backed companies, such as pubs and care homes, and companies with predictable revenue streams, such as renewable energy plants) and listed investments (typically established, cash-generative businesses listed on AIM).

Following the introduction of new stricter VCT rules, Downing has had to tweak its approach. Whilst its existing portfolio can still include its historic holdings, new investments need to be in growth opportunities.

That’s worrying. Wealth Club gives the biggest unquoted investments:

  1. Tracsis – scheduling and rostering software for trains
  2. WEAK YES

  3. Downing Care Homes – residential care homes with the smae name as the fund errrr
  4. hmm

  5. Parsable – as above

At this point I am unsure on this one… how much has well-meaning intention been polluted over time?

To continue, is it worth pulling out of Jupiter Responsible

and investing in this instead?

I found a top10 and even a top22:

Doneloans Limited – sinister, no info, 5% – NOPE

Tracsis – as above, WEAK YES

Downing Care Homes Holdings Limited – still dodgy second time round? – NOPE

Baron House Developments Llp -property developers, NOPE

Downing Strategic Micro-Cap Investment Trust PLC – NOPE

Cadbury House Holdings – hotel and spa? not 100% sure, NOPE

Pilgrim Trading – nursery group? – PASS

Inland Homes plc Ordinary 10p – property developers NOPE

Xupes Limited – “Curated pre-owned and hard-to-find watches, handbags, jewellery and artworks from selected brands or artists we know, love & stand behind” – WOT

Leytonstone Pub

Verdict = BAD … but then again, probably better than Jupiter Income …

Fund Review – Rathbone Ethical Bond Fund

(Review from 2019 plus usual disclaimers apply)

The Rathbone Ethical Bond Fund get off to a bad start by promising “Open and transparent ethical criteria and reporting lines” without providing the ethical criteria.

What companies are in its holdings? amongst others, Rabobank NL, Lloyds Bank, Rothschild Finance, HSBC. I actually refuse to believe these holdings are not funding arms manufacturers. So they pass the negative screening but not my hard ethical stance.

Let’s take HSBC for example:
https://waronwant.org/media/bds-victory-hsbc-divests-elbit
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/hsbc-agm-protests-israel-government-arms-companies-investment-war-on-want-a8314396.html
https://theecologist.org/2018/may/21/are-you-funding-fracking-and-nuclear-weapon-manufacturing

Anyway, despite the open and transparent pledge, i can find nothing about their ethical criteria more than a statement about “strict ethical and financial criteria.”

The interim report for the fund goes no further than this, with no mention of screening.
When I emailed them, the quickly replied with a link to the criteria so that was handy. And what are they like? Well a standard negative screening, plus a very vague positive screening. T

To qualify for inclusion in the fund’s universe, issuers should demonstrate progressive or well-developed practice or policies in one of the following key areas:

    • Corporate community investment
    • Employment
    • Human rights

Management of environmental impacts

2020 UPDATE

EMAILED rutm@rathbones.com about requested page “/downloads/fund-related/ethical-screening-criteria-1-2016_3554.pdf” could not be found.

VERDICT= NOPE not good enough

Fund Review – Unicorn UK Ethical Income Fund

(Review from 2019 plus usual disclaimers apply)

Unicorn UK Ethical Income Fund

Ethical Criteria

To their credit, the Unicorn ethical criteria was quite easy to find, on page 50 of the prospectus which was easy to find on their website –

Ethical Criteria and Investments:The fund’s predefined ethical criteria and the ethical nature of the fund’s investments are reviewed on a quarterly basis by the ACD [referring to Unicorn Asset Management]. The ACD operates a screening process which identifies those companies and organisations that, according to internal and external research and analysis, do not meet the agreed ethical criteria. The policy considers all of the following ethical issues:

    • Alcohol
    • Armaments
    • Gambling
    • Pornography
    • Tobacco
    • Human rights
    • Animal testing
    • The Environment

The ACD’s reports for the fund will provide further information. A full specification of the criteria is available from the ACD upon request.

So I requested the full specs and got a fast reply, which was quite informative.

Basically the Unicorn UK Ethical Income Fund is the Unicorn UK Income Fund (which contains 37 companies) with extra screening. The negative screening outlined above takes out 2 funds, then there is an ESG (Environmental, Social and Governance) test. Then there is the Unicorn Internal Assessment, which apparently removed another 6 tests. That only indicates to me how toothless the first two steps were. So i think we are now left with 29 undisclosed companies.

Top holdings

So what about the top10 holdings? Let’s take a look:

  • 1 CINEWORLD GROUP
  • 2 PHOENIX GROUP HOLDINGS PLC
  • 3 4IMPRINT GROUP PLC
  • 4 MARSHALLS
  • 5 DAIRY CREST GROUP
  • 6 TELECOM PLUS
  • 7 VESUVIUS PLC
  • 8 JAMES HALSTEAD
  • 9 RPS GROUP
  • 10 MUCKLOW (A&J) GROUP PLC ORD

One by one

To have Cineworld the multinational cinema conglomerate as the top holding at over 5% is interesting. Here’s their ethical principles from their annual report:

Notice it doesn’t mention their workers and Picturehouse (owned by Cineworld) employees in the UK have been striking for a living wage for several years now.

Unsurprisingly Dairy Crest make dairy products, includign many household names. Therefore they should be immediately cut out on animal rights grounds.

I actually had a good laugh with my dad trying to work out what Vesuvius do. For a brief moment I knew what tundish was. It turns out they are a global leader in metal flow engineering!? Their annual report mentions ‘ethical’ 14 times, but always very briefly. I mean, Vesuvius develops innovative, customised high-quality products, services and solutions, to be used in extremely demanding, high-temperature industrial environments so as long as they aren’t being total dicks how can what they do be ethical or not?

James Halstead plc is a major international group of companies that manufacture many of the notable brands in commercial, contract and consumer flooring.

 

2020 EDIT – LOL I left this 2019 review halfway, but I may as well have published it

VERDICT = NOPE